|
|
Post by rinaldo on Jun 30, 2016 10:05:00 GMT -5
You have any idea what kind of shit Mark Ruffalo had to get into to become huge, muscular and green? JJ.
|
|
|
|
Post by rocketking on Jun 30, 2016 11:05:56 GMT -5
If you ask me the whole suspension thing is a farce. In a sport where competition would matter say baseball football etc etc, the "non rigged" sports if you would yes it matters. WWE isn't a sport its entertainment, wrestling is an art sure but other then being illegal in the states who gives two shits? It's not like these guys are doing something that affects stuff. It's all rigged, Stallone did steroids, Arnold got busted for em too, didn't hurt them, why should it matter for WWE? I think the whole thing is dumb. Maybe it SHOULDN'T matter in WWE, but it does. I'm the first guy to defend Roman Reigns and I know that not everybody that has failed a drug test is a degenerate or an addict, but this is a fact: Wrestlers are altering their body and brain chemistry while holding a job that includes taking their safety and the safety of others in their hands. And that's not to mention a list of premature deaths a mile long, each one of which saw the words "WWE" or "Vince McMahon" mentioned explicitly when they were reported in the mainstream media. The WWE drug policy is the responsible thing to do, and it has undoubtedly cleaned up a business that was in desperate need of cleaning up. The fact that Roman Reigns doesn't need steroids to win wrestling matches (but if you look at WWE history, this is also a pretty arguable point) has nothing to do with it. |
|
|
|
Post by rinaldo on Jun 30, 2016 11:30:22 GMT -5
Also, it'd be kinda dumb taling steroids considering his body is mostly covered by his outfit.
|
|
deezy
Misawa
Posts: 2,334 
|
Post by deezy on Jun 30, 2016 19:56:30 GMT -5
It wasn't steroids.
It was an amphetamine, probably popped a Molly with some beers.
Harmless, nobody would ever be allowed into an arena, let alone a ring if they were under the influence. This isn't TNA, they'd fire anyone (and have) if they showed up inebriated.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gee Hall on Jul 2, 2016 1:18:38 GMT -5
It wasn't steroids. It was an amphetamine, probably popped a Molly with some beers. Source? |
|
|
|
Post by rinaldo on Jul 3, 2016 9:22:34 GMT -5
It wasn't steroids. It was an amphetamine, probably popped a Molly with some beers. Source? The IWC. So you know it hs to be real. |
|
deezy
Misawa
Posts: 2,334
|
Post by deezy on Jul 4, 2016 14:48:18 GMT -5
PWInsider.
Besides, nobody does steroids anymore.
Maybe people should learn about the shit they supposedly get upset about.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gee Hall on Jul 4, 2016 22:35:44 GMT -5
PWInsider. Maybe people should learn about the shit they supposedly get upset about. I see that allegedly tossed around with that as well. I guess we'll never know. I'm not sure who is upset about this. |
|
deezy
Misawa
Posts: 2,334
|
Post by deezy on Jul 4, 2016 22:48:26 GMT -5
I see it from the people who pretend to hate all PEDs in sports, but don't know what constitutes what a PED is.
They need to research or shut the fuck up imo.
I'm not directing that at people, but I do see the words "steroids" being tossed around and I'm just giving some 411 on that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gee Hall on Jul 4, 2016 23:06:11 GMT -5
I see it from the people who pretend to hate all PEDs in sports, but don't know what constitutes what a PED is. . Umm.... what? If a PED is a PED, and PEDs are not allowed, it violates the rules. If it is not a PED, then it violates nothing. There is no pretending. If people are anti-PED, this does not include things that are not PEDs. What in the fuck are you talking about? |
|
deezy
Misawa
Posts: 2,334
|
Post by deezy on Jul 4, 2016 23:21:09 GMT -5
I see it from the people who pretend to hate all PEDs in sports, but don't know what constitutes what a PED is. . Umm.... what? If a PED is a PED, and PEDs are not allowed, it violates the rules. If it is not a PED, then it violates nothing. There is no pretending. If people are anti-PED, this does not include things that are not PEDs. What in the fuck are you talking about? A freaking advil or sleeping aid constitutes a PED. Even cough medicine has lead to Olympians losing medals. |
|
|
|
Post by Gee Hall on Jul 5, 2016 8:07:40 GMT -5
Umm.... what? If a PED is a PED, and PEDs are not allowed, it violates the rules. If it is not a PED, then it violates nothing. There is no pretending. If people are anti-PED, this does not include things that are not PEDs. What in the fuck are you talking about? A freaking advil or sleeping aid constitutes a PED. Even cough medicine has lead to Olympians losing medals. Then therefore these are defined as being PEDs. It doesn't matter if you agree or disagree whether they actually enhance performance or not. The people who decide have their reasons and will not be consulting you. They are PEDs. |
|
deezy
Misawa
Posts: 2,334
|
Post by deezy on Jul 5, 2016 14:36:16 GMT -5
A freaking advil or sleeping aid constitutes a PED. Even cough medicine has lead to Olympians losing medals. Then therefore these are defined as being PEDs. It doesn't matter if you agree or disagree whether they actually enhance performance or not. The people who decide have their reasons and will not be consulting you. They are PEDs. so a doctor shouldn't be allowed in sports unless they practice........malpractice. Ok, athletes shouldn't be healthy, because its an unfair advantage. Nerds in labcoats are making this up as they go along IMO. All medicine is a PED....it's supposed to enhance your performance, if it didn't.....it's litigation city. |
|
|
|
Post by Milky on Jul 6, 2016 15:44:46 GMT -5
The big question for me in all of this is whether or not Reigns' suspension should have been acknowledged on WWE television and used as part of a storyline. The fact that they did so is akin to admitting that certain performers won't suffer the same consequences as others if they violate the Wellness Policy.
Case in point, where was Adam Rose's WrestleMania push once he got popped in April?
Personally, I actually like the fact they brought it up in storyline because everyone knew it anyway and it was a more realistic-type of storyline that I like. It reminded me of something ROH would book.
I do think it's unfair that some guys get suspended and disappear whereas top guys get suspended and it furthers their storyline pushes, but maybe this will set a future precedent that suspensions will be acknowledged on television to either continue or end feuds.
For me I like anything that's more realistic so if this eventually leads to a heel turn for Reigns I'm all for it. And if it doesn't, well, then that's just plain weird because it should.
|
|
deezy
Misawa
Posts: 2,334
|
Post by deezy on Jul 6, 2016 19:54:52 GMT -5
Some nobody jobber isn't he same as the guy who is supposed to be your shining diamond.....you either reap the rewards, or feel the pressure.
|
|
