|
Post by Alan Jones on Oct 11, 2014 20:19:12 GMT -5
We are getting close to Wrestlemania season so why not make some predictions. Here are a couple of matches that I would like to see.
Daniel Bryan vs. Seth Rollins(C) WWE Title Brock Lesnar vs. The Rock Rusev vs. Roman Reigns Dean Ambrose (as a heel) vs. John Cena
...and sure throw in Undertaker vs. Sting if they both still wanna work.
|
|
|
Post by antlerbeast on Oct 12, 2014 3:18:47 GMT -5
Hogan vs Cena Reigns vs Ambrose vs Rollins vs Brock(c) - WWE Title (maybe not with Brock and Rollins champ) Steve Austin vs The Rock HHH vs CM Punk (I know right?) Sting vs Undertaker Rusev vs Angle
|
|
|
Post by chrisarrant on Oct 13, 2014 9:36:32 GMT -5
Here's my predictions on what it will be based on WWE's current direction:
WWE Title: Rock vs. Brock Special Attraction: Sting vs. Undertaker Diva's Title: Charlotte (w/ Ric) vs. AJ Lee Dean Ambrose vs. Roman Reigns vs. Seth Rollins John Cena vs. Rusev Daniel Bryan vs. Cesaro Battle Royal: Bad News Barrett wins Tag Title Fatal 4-Way: The Usos vs. The Dust Bros. vs. Ascension vs. SlaterGator (or some other warm-up tag team)
That does leave a lot of guys out in the cold like Orton, Big Show, Bray Wyatt, Jericho, Ziggler, Sheamus and Harper.
|
|
|
Post by Jack Raines on Oct 14, 2014 4:18:05 GMT -5
My predicted card:
Roman Reigns vs. Brock Lesnar (WWE title) Charlotte vs. Paige (Divas Title) AJ Lee vs. Stephanie McMahon Triple H vs. The Rock Dean Ambrose (heel) vs. Daniel Bryan John Cena vs. Undertaker Bray Wyatt (babyface) vs. Rusev Seth Rollins vs. Randy Orton Dolph Ziggler vs. Sheamus vs. Cesaro vs. The Miz (for the unified IC/US title)
|
|
|
Post by RKing85 on Oct 20, 2014 23:09:37 GMT -5
If Brock Lesnar is going to retain the title at Mania, then I hope he's in there with Reigns. If there is going to be a new champ, then I hope he's in there with Ambrose.
|
|
|
Post by Jack Raines on Oct 21, 2014 1:35:05 GMT -5
If Brock Lesnar is going to retain the title at Mania, then I hope he's in there with Reigns. If there is going to be a new champ, then I hope he's in there with Ambrose. If Brock goes against Reigns at 'Mania, the whole point would be to put Roman over and establish him as the new top face of WWE to eventually replace Cena. I also wish they'd go with Ambrose in that role, but I can't see WWE putting that much faith in him and changing their long-term plans.
|
|
|
Post by RKing85 on Oct 22, 2014 9:28:43 GMT -5
reports are the WWE has cooled big time on Reigns, especially with that horrible RAW interview he did a few weeks back.
But 90% of the WWE audience doesn't know that. So continue to make him look the guy on tv, everyone will think he is going to beat Brock, and then Brock winning will make whoever does beat him (whenever) even bigger.
And that knocks Reigns back down the card a little and gives him another year or two to develop. He wouldn't be killed forever which I'm sure some people will claim.
|
|
deezy
Misawa
Posts: 2,334
|
Post by deezy on Oct 23, 2014 15:06:02 GMT -5
reports are the WWE has cooled big time on Reigns, especially with that horrible RAW interview he did a few weeks back. But 90% of the WWE audience doesn't know that. So continue to make him look the guy on tv, everyone will think he is going to beat Brock, and then Brock winning will make whoever does beat him (whenever) even bigger. And that knocks Reigns back down the card a little and gives him another year or two to develop. He wouldn't be killed forever which I'm sure some people will claim. What reports? Speculation from guys who have no press credentials and zero access to actual WWE employees? Isn't he supposed to be Triple H's replacement, and judging from the guys he picked for Evolution and the sheer amount of times they were given more than a benefit of the doubt, and pushed constantly (even when one was 2 strikes deep). Not buying it.
|
|
|
Post by Andrew Sheehy on Oct 23, 2014 16:11:08 GMT -5
It's all but a lock that were getting Reigns-Lesnar.
|
|
|
Post by chrisarrant on Oct 23, 2014 19:39:27 GMT -5
It's all but a lock that were getting Reigns-Lesnar. It looks that way today, but things change drastically. Look at the previous WM main events and what they were projected to be 6 months before the event and you'll see how much they can change. Rock vs. Cena 1 and 2 were the exceptions.
|
|
|
Post by RKing85 on Oct 23, 2014 23:15:38 GMT -5
Meltzer said McMahon was disgusted with that Reigns segment.
And I'm aware it will probably still be Reigns. My post said what I hope happens, not what I expect to.
|
|
|
Post by rustytrombone on Oct 27, 2014 15:19:57 GMT -5
Meltzer said McMahon was disgusted with that Reigns segment. And I'm aware it will probably still be Reigns. My post said what I hope happens, not what I expect to. Meltzer talks out of his ass and the fanboys that believe anything he says are retarded. Don't you see how he words his drivel so he's right in both scenarios? "WWE has cooled on Reigns" but "The fans don't know that, so Reigns will be on TV." There are idiots that give this shithead money to read and listen to his horseshit. You could get more accurate pro wrestling information by drinking a glass of buttermilk and then staring into my cat's asshole.
|
|
deezy
Misawa
Posts: 2,334
|
Post by deezy on Oct 27, 2014 22:26:45 GMT -5
TMZ has a better track record in wrestling than Meltzer has.
|
|
|
Post by cadoob on Oct 29, 2014 9:16:57 GMT -5
First time poster..here goes
Lesnar vs Ambrose (Roman isn't ready, maybe by WM32 he will be but he wont in 5 months). Sting vs Taker Cena vs Russev Punk vs HHH Orton vs Bray Wyatt Rollins vs Daniel Bryan
|
|
|
Post by Jack Raines on Oct 30, 2014 1:15:09 GMT -5
TMZ has a better track record in wrestling than Meltzer has. I'm guessing that you've never actually read an issue of the Wrestling Observer Newsletter, and instead you're basing that on random "news" sites that make up shit and credit it to Dave Meltzer. Nine times out of ten, Dave's pretty damn accurate.
|
|