|
|
Post by D.G Mitchell on Jul 13, 2014 22:52:47 GMT -5
I missed the first run of the hour special previewing the Monday Night War on the network and its not on demand, anyone got a link?
thanks
|
|
|
|
Post by Doug Lyons on Jul 14, 2014 3:14:15 GMT -5
I seen it. I like it. Very well done but not a lot of new insight. Most of it is archive interviews.
|
|
|
|
Post by aramnasrallah on Jul 14, 2014 5:02:26 GMT -5
Get the network and support WWE  |
|
|
|
Post by richiecuk on Jul 14, 2014 5:33:16 GMT -5
its not on the network i think that was the point
|
|
|
|
Post by Hacksaw Jim Powers on Jul 14, 2014 12:43:10 GMT -5
Where can someone see it?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 15, 2014 12:48:57 GMT -5
It's bullshit that it's not available on demand via the network and paying customers have to seek out a third party stream or download.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gee Hall on Jul 15, 2014 16:05:22 GMT -5
It's bullshit that it's not available on demand via the network and paying customers have to seek out a third party stream or download. It was a sneak peak intentionally airing one time only to entice people to sign up. It will officially start airing later this summer. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 15, 2014 20:27:25 GMT -5
Airing it once to entice free trial signups but not offering it on-demand for already paying subscribers of a struggling network is just bad customer service.
I wasn't too upset since it became easily available on various streaming sites within hours of airing, but having to use DailyMotion to watch a network special while paying for the network's service= Bullshit and beyond lame.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 15, 2014 22:13:49 GMT -5
I seen it and it was okay. It amazes me how much mileage WWE have got of that Eric Bischoff interview they did almost 10 years ago.
Quite intresting that they have footage of a Ted Turner interview from 1998/9.
|
|
|
|
Post by Gee Hall on Jul 16, 2014 0:53:27 GMT -5
Airing it once to entice free trial signups but not offering it on-demand for already paying subscribers of a struggling network is just bad customer service. I wasn't too upset since it became easily available on various streaming sites within hours of airing, but having to use DailyMotion to watch a network special while paying for the network's service= Bullshit and beyond lame. LOL. Dude, you are paying for 2 PPV's a year to watch all of it. The old model is saving you a shitload of money while the WWE bleeds to death in front of you. You get all the PPV's. ALL OF THEM. They used to cost the US people $60 a pop. SMH... The WWE should not spend a single dollar producing new content for the service. They should use the library as the incentive for bonus material, considering you are saving $600 a year under the old model for PPVs. Everything else is gravy. Stop complaining about saving money. |
|
|
|
Post by Hacksaw Jim Powers on Jul 16, 2014 1:13:16 GMT -5
I seen it and it was okay. It amazes me how much mileage WWE have got of that Eric Bischoff interview they did almost 10 years ago. Is that the one where he's up in a private box somewhere or something high up like that, and the Titantron is behind him? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 16, 2014 4:17:45 GMT -5
Airing it once to entice free trial signups but not offering it on-demand for already paying subscribers of a struggling network is just bad customer service. I wasn't too upset since it became easily available on various streaming sites within hours of airing, but having to use DailyMotion to watch a network special while paying for the network's service= Bullshit and beyond lame. LOL. Dude, you are paying for 2 PPV's a year to watch all of it. The old model is saving you a shitload of money while the WWE bleeds to death in front of you. You get all the PPV's. ALL OF THEM. They used to cost the US people $60 a pop. SMH... The WWE should not spend a single dollar producing new content for the service. They should use the library as the incentive for bonus material, considering you are saving $600 a year under the old model for PPVs. Everything else is gravy. Stop complaining about saving money. The gist of my previous posts is that it's illogical as a WWE Network subscriber to have to seek out WWE Network content from a third party. Heavy criticism of one aspect of the network does not equate to proclaiming the service as a whole isn't a great value, because it obviously is. Nobody in this entire thread denied or disputed the network's value, so you can relax with the plugs, Maggle. And clearly the "one night only" preview attempt to bring in free trial signups didn't work, as WWE was pushing the network and the free sign-up an average of once every 10.5 minutes on this week's RAW despite the trial period ending less than an hour after RAW's conclusion. So if trying to draw people in with the preview did not work, what logic is there of withholding it from existing subscribers? In regards to WWE's apparent exsanguination as a corporate entity, the network's business model being a fiscal disaster for the company is beyond my control. Criticisms from the perspective of subscribers will exist regardless of how successful or unsuccessful the network is. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 16, 2014 13:24:04 GMT -5
I seen it and it was okay. It amazes me how much mileage WWE have got of that Eric Bischoff interview they did almost 10 years ago. Is that the one where he's up in a private box somewhere or something high up like that, and the Titantron is behind him? Yes that's the interview i'm talking about. |
|
|
|
Post by Gee Hall on Jul 16, 2014 13:34:03 GMT -5
And clearly the "one night only" preview attempt to bring in free trial signups didn't work, as WWE was pushing the network and the free sign-up an average of once every 10.5 minutes on this week's RAW despite the trial period ending less than an hour after RAW's conclusion. So if trying to draw people in with the preview did not work, what logic is there of withholding it from existing subscribers? Source? Can you please show us proof of this fact you claim? |
|
|
|
Post by groovyphoenix on Jul 22, 2014 15:16:07 GMT -5
And clearly the "one night only" preview attempt to bring in free trial signups didn't work, as WWE was pushing the network and the free sign-up an average of once every 10.5 minutes on this week's RAW despite the trial period ending less than an hour after RAW's conclusion. So if trying to draw people in with the preview did not work, what logic is there of withholding it from existing subscribers? Source? Can you please show us proof of this fact you claim? Watch the show and listen? I'm not sure it's 10.5 seconds like he said but I can attest to the fact I'm really tired of hearing them push the product like they do, every time they end a segment "get the WWE App, Get the WWE Network! MAKE IT AVAILABLE IN CANADA AND I WILL, That's Vinnie mac's short sightedness for you as they cram it down my throat but don't make it available. I WOULD get it, but I CANNOT! (and no I'm not signing up for a US version etc, the heck with that, if you can't offer it, then stop pushing it! |
|
