|
Post by Zekey on Dec 19, 2016 18:55:33 GMT -5
That really was backwards booking. That booking would have been fine if Banks was the heel and Charlotte the face but it's the opposite. I'm also really done with that feud, I love both women but I'm just tired of having that title flip so many times. This is Charlotte's 4th reign ending Sasha's 3rd and the title was only introduced at Mania. The title is not even a year old and we've had 7 reigns. I think of it as these are the 2 greatest WWE women of all-time. The 2 are so evenly matched, every time they face they exchange wins. The title changes reflect that. Trish is the Ric Flair of womens wrestling with 7 reigns. Sasha & Charlotte are already half way there. Both should reach 7 reigns IMO.
|
|
|
Post by RKing85 on Dec 19, 2016 22:48:54 GMT -5
no, it was the not being able to last another 2 seconds. Especially considering she was starting at the clock the whole time to make sure she hit her cue. I thought they put her in the lock a bit too early. For a protected finisher, she was in there to long IMO. Like HBK being in the sharpshooter for like 70-80 seconds at the end of the WM 12 match.
|
|
|
Post by Christian Small on Dec 20, 2016 9:57:49 GMT -5
That really was backwards booking. That booking would have been fine if Banks was the heel and Charlotte the face but it's the opposite. I'm also really done with that feud, I love both women but I'm just tired of having that title flip so many times. This is Charlotte's 4th reign ending Sasha's 3rd and the title was only introduced at Mania. The title is not even a year old and we've had 7 reigns. I think of it as these are the 2 greatest WWE women of all-time. The 2 are so evenly matched, every time they face they exchange wins. The title changes reflect that. Trish is the Ric Flair of womens wrestling with 7 reigns. Sasha & Charlotte are already half way there. Both should reach 7 reigns IMO. I'm not against both women having multiple title reigns during their careers, my issue is the amount of time that this has happened in. First the title switching so many times takes away the impact of a new champion because you become used to it happening, there's little reason to get excited because you know the next time it's defended it'll be switched. Second it lessens the importance of the reign itself. Trish had 7 reigns as champ but she won her first in 01 and her last in 06, including a reign that went over a year. You may not remember every one of Trish's reigns but you do remember some of the key moments. Both Sasha & Charlotte barely get going before the belt is moved over. Like I said I love both these women but I just think you could have spread out the title switches instead of doing so many in such a short time.
|
|
|
Post by rocketking on Dec 20, 2016 12:52:43 GMT -5
no, it was the not being able to last another 2 seconds. Especially considering she was starting at the clock the whole time to make sure she hit her cue. I thought they put her in the lock a bit too early. For a protected finisher, she was in there to long IMO. Like HBK being in the sharpshooter for like 70-80 seconds at the end of the WM 12 match. I agree. The biggest issue I have is how blatantly aware of time Sasha was. I don't know that there still is an original way to book the finish to an Iron Man match. Sasha won't be hurt by it, but she also not as over as the Internet thinks. Also, I know WWE had to spin their monthly "things the women haven't done yet" wheel before booking this match, but I would have rather seen a 2-of-3 falls or straight-up singles match that goes 30+ minutes unannounced. It still could have been advertised as "the end of the line" with no rematch clause or whatever else.
|
|
|
Post by RKing85 on Dec 20, 2016 23:18:54 GMT -5
I hate ironman matches. Just can not get into them. I only need to watch the last minute.
|
|