|
Post by The Pod-Father! on Aug 22, 2012 17:28:49 GMT -5
This is pretty fascinating...And in a way kinda sad.
As stupid as it was at times, I never thought the angle was as bad at most made it out to be. And while Julia should have known what she was getting into, I can see her being surprised at the personal nature of the IWC's backlash towards her.
I wish her the best of luck in her future endeavors, and if I ever go on the Popeye ride at Universal Studios, I'll give her an Apple-Tini as a peace offering.
|
|
|
Post by smoke on Aug 22, 2012 17:33:14 GMT -5
All that happened was people saying she was acting poorly which she was, but who knows she might have been doing exactly what she was asked to by tna. And also posting some videos she was using to sell herself in order to get more work. Unless I missed something, what did the IWC do that was bad?
|
|
|
Post by The Pod-Father! on Aug 22, 2012 17:39:28 GMT -5
All that happened was people saying she was acting poorly which she was, but who knows she might have been doing exactly what she was asked to by tna. And also posting some videos she was using to sell herself in order to get more work. Unless I missed something, what did the IWC do that was bad? My understanding was that people were spamming the comment sections of her videos (while they were up) with wrestling-related stuff as well as unflattering stuff about her acting ability and her appearance. The bigger point though (if I'm in Julia-Claire's shoes) is the privacy aspect of it. All of a sudden you wake up one day and there's dozens of wrestling fans (who have been known to be a tad trollish at times) that have access to your personal info (via Linkedin). She probably should have expected it...But I can understand how that instant rush of attention (most of it negative) could freak a person out.
|
|
|
Post by smoke on Aug 22, 2012 18:01:47 GMT -5
Thank you for clearing that up for me. As a person who values his own privacy, I can understand why she wouldn't have enjoyed that. On the other hand, if you don't want to be famous and experience the positives and negatives that come with that, being an actress might not have been the best way to go.
I am still laughing about AJ calling her a foot. He went from I don't know, to who would have sex with a foot.
|
|
|
Post by mmelchor on Aug 22, 2012 18:11:11 GMT -5
As stupid as it was at times, I never thought the angle was as bad at most made it out to be. Sorry, Nate, but yeah, it was. As for Reilly...if she got nothing but trolled for simply accepting a role I'd break out of there, too. It's one thing to hate the angle (which I obviously did), but not the people playing a part. That's like hounding Ryan Reynolds for Green Lantern when it was clear he wasn't given much to work with, anyway. I definitely hope she sees better days (and roles) than this. And seeing as how I live about 20 minutes from Universal, I'll have to find her at Toon Lagoon and apologize on behalf of sensible fans.
|
|
|
Post by groovyphoenix on Aug 22, 2012 22:35:22 GMT -5
Frankly if it is caused by people shitting on her acting, she isn't cut out to be an actress or a "star" if it was due to her privacy being invaded and a PUBLICLY available linked shared? Again, not the smartest move. The internet is anything BUT private and expecting privacy about anything you place on the net is also ludicrous. I didn't have a HUGE issue with the angle, sure it was a bit way out there, the story a bit odd considering that if I had been AJ and suspected drugging I would have demanded a paternaty test off the bat. It went to totally idiotic with his statement however that he'd play daddy if he lost a match... So wait, his integrity is wrapped up into a match and if he loses... Lets forget that he's probably innocent, but nope, if he loses a match he'll be daddy? Wow... that was the fart that cleared the room! I mean come on! I don't blame AJ nor Claire or whatever her name is, they didn't write the storyline. The "I was asleep/drugged/drunk etc... well not perfect it at least made some sense. And if AJ WAS discovered as being the father with those photos? Wouldn't that be considered rape? I mean, clearly he wasn't concious or able to deny/decline Claires advances! All I'll say is, Amen its over this Thursday, AJ will hopefully come out with the paperwork and say "Tada... I'm not the daddy!" and walk out "vindicated" worse case, they could cotniue it by saying "Kazarian You are the father!" dum dum dum!!! That would neatly wrap up WHAT Daniels has of Kaz.... They both conspired, and Kaz after seeing everything go down got hot and heavy with Claire (the slut!) and she's having Kaz's baby! Daniels knew this blackmaled Kaz to make him comply with his plan to blame and destroy AJ's marriage etc. At least that would tie up a ton of little loose ends, and you blow it off with one finaly big "revenge" match which AJ of course would win. Please pass the Kleenex!
|
|
|
Post by Danny Powers on Sept 22, 2012 11:46:00 GMT -5
Claire Lynch finds new acting job as Libertarian congressional candidate.
|
|