Undertaker vs Brock Lesnar Angle

[darlotto99]

alright so I think at WrestleMania it will be Brock vs Undertaker so here is an angle I am up with. Bring back Heyman and Bock to lead a faction called "the Next Big Thing" and a heal tag team of Brodus Clay and Albert who would drop their current gimmicks and turn heal. This would allow Undertaker some opponents leading up to a match against when Brock is not their due to his limited dates. Have Taker battle the Next Big Thing faction then have Undertaker vs Brock Lesnar at WrestleMania

[robintripp]

Even though Undertaker is probably only going to be back for one match?

[damian1984]

I don't think they need to do that, the streak being on the line is enough for someone like Brock to come in and say they want to be the one to end it no need for any factions to be created.

[Stevie H]

I think WWE would be silly to waste Undertaker in anything other than Mania at this point in his career. The streak is a big deal and if they only have him wrestle 1 time a year they can string his streak on for a few more years (and help towards the buy rates too).

[kidcanada]

I still want to know why Undertaker said "you wanna do it?" or "you gonna do it?" when Brock walked past him leaving the Octagon back then with Helwani. Maybe turn that into something.

[Patrick McFadden]

Brock/Taker on paper seems like a good WM match up but I'm not sure how invested I'd be in it considering how perfect an ending HIAC at 28 was. HIAC against HHH at Mania with Shawn as the special referee....that's incredibly hard to top and Brock isn't enough to top that 20-0 moment.

Something along the lines of Cena/Taker or Sting/Taker would be, imho, the two matches worthy of a Taker Wrestlemania match up.

[wapcaplets]

Personally, I can't get into any taker WM match anymore. It's a foregone conclusion that he's going to win so, unless they really bring in someone new who can (in a wrestling context) be a believable opponent I don't really care who he wrestles. Don't get me wrong... the matches he has are great and it's not Taker's fault that there are no "credible" opponents for him so this isn't a bash on Taker.

[workmancer]

Taker is fine if they retired him this year. Think about it why bring Taker back for something that won't close his career like Hell in a Cell with HHH and HBK?

[yogeorge]

i used to think that john cena could beat taker at mania... but then he lost to the rock.

if they build up brock for a year (have him beat cena and rock) then i think he could be a credible opponent. either way, i think that brock is the most ideal opponent for taker at next year's mania.

[yaknow]

Apr 9, 2012 17:50:53 GMT -5 wapcaplets said:

Personally, I can't get into any taker WM match anymore. It's a foregone conclusion that he's going to win so, unless they really bring in someone new who can (in a wrestling context) be a believable opponent I don't really care who he wrestles. Don't get me wrong... the matches he has are great and it's not Taker's fault that there are no "credible" opponents for him so this isn't a bash on Taker.

I had that same attitude going into his match with HHH this year and I ended up actually enjoying the match because of the role reversals in match with Undertaker ending up needing to do anything he could to put an end to HHH. Without that though yeah it would have came up flat. I think my ideal this year would be Cena vs Undertaker with a Cena heel turn by cheating to win.

[vicbomb5]

I believe Brock is going to hold the belt from Rumble to Mania.

Rock will come back and win the Rumble to earn a shot at the title and face Brock at Mania to "save" the WWE from Brock.