|
|
Post by waiaskwai on Apr 10, 2012 17:20:25 GMT -5
According to WON, will fall between 2.9-3.1 range with 4.29 million viewers.
Ouch.
|
|
|
|
Post by gonzo.at on Apr 10, 2012 17:23:20 GMT -5
sry, but i'm not from the us ... no idea what 2.9 - 3.1 means. is it percentage of viewers?
|
|
|
|
Post by waiaskwai on Apr 10, 2012 17:32:18 GMT -5
more from zap2it..
WWE Entertainment USA 10:00 PM 4.342 million viewers / 1.7
WWE Entertainment USA 9:00 PM 4.230 million viewers / 1.6
2nd hour had a slightly higher rating, and more viewers.
to answer the previous post, I'm too lazy to explain, so here's wiki's answer...
The most commonly cited Nielsen results are reported in two measurements: ratings points and share, usually reported as: "ratings points/share". As of September 1, 2010, there are an estimated 115.9 million television households in the United States. A single national ratings point represents one percent of the total number, or 115,900,000 households for the 2010–11 season.[2] Nielsen re-estimates the number of TV-equipped households each August for the upcoming television season.
Share is the percentage of television sets in use tuned to the program. For example, Nielsen may report a show as receiving a 9.2/15 during its broadcast, meaning that on average 9.2 percent of all television-equipped households were tuned in to that program at any given moment, while 15 percent of households watching TV were tuned into that program during this time slot. The difference between rating and share is that a rating reflects the percentage of the total population of televisions tuned to a particular program while share reflects the percentage of televisions actually in use
|
|
|
|
Post by yaknow on Apr 10, 2012 17:54:22 GMT -5
Brock was never really a ratings draw so the question just is will more people buy the PPV as he did sell PPVs while in UFC. He certainly didn't draw viewers on the Ultimate Fighter.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jonathan Pine on Apr 10, 2012 17:56:36 GMT -5
Vince is hitting the panic button right now. At least they can't blame Punk for this.
|
|
|
|
Post by yaknow on Apr 10, 2012 17:58:28 GMT -5
Sure he can; they lost viewers in the second hour and he was on in the second hour. Plus his segment wasn't all that good.
|
|
|
|
Post by mcmax3000 on Apr 10, 2012 19:30:18 GMT -5
He certainly didn't draw viewers on the Ultimate Fighter. I could be remembering things wrong but I think his TUF season did pretty well the first week or two. He could draw viewers, he just wasn't able to keep them when people realized that season was one of the most boring the UFC has produced. |
|
|
|
Post by jabberman on Apr 10, 2012 19:36:49 GMT -5
That's a big hit! DAMN!
|
|
|
|
Post by waiaskwai on Apr 10, 2012 20:28:58 GMT -5
He certainly didn't draw viewers on the Ultimate Fighter. I could be remembering things wrong but I think his TUF season did pretty well the first week or two. He could draw viewers, he just wasn't able to keep them when people realized that season was one of the most boring the UFC has produced. At most, Lesnar's season would have peaked at 1.5-million viewers... he's not an electric personality... people pay to see him fight, period. |
|
